Stephen F. Ross
Selected Publications

Academic Publications

Network Economic Effects and the Limits of Efficiency, Antitrust L.J. (symposium forthcoming)

Necessary Restraints and Inefficient Monopoly Sports Leagues, 1 Int’l Sports L. Rev. 27 (2000) (with Stefan Szymanski)

Statutory Interpretation in the Courtroom, the Classroom, and Canadian Legal Literature, 31 Ottawa L. Rev. 39 (2000)

Myths, Realities, and Creative Approaches to Antitrust and Franchise Relocation Issues, 14 Antitrust 57 (Spring 2000)

Anti-competitive aspects of sports, 7 (Australian) Competition & Consumer L.J. 125 (1999)

The Modern Parol Evidence Rule and its Implications for New Textualist Statutory Interpretation, 87 Georgetown L.J. (forthcoming 1998) (with Daniel Tranen)

"Pro-Competitive Executive Compensation" as a Condition for Approval of Mergers that Simultaneously Exploit Consumers and Enhance Efficiency, Canadian Competition Record (spring 1998) (with Ian Ayres)

Restraints on Player Competition that Facilitate Competitive Balance and Player Development and their Legality in the United States and Europe (symposium on player market regulation in professional team sports, forthcoming from Univ. of Neuchatel, Switzerland)

Why Highly Paid Athletes Deserve More Antitrust Protection than Unionized Factory Workers, 33 Antitrust Bulletin 641 (1997) (with Robert B. Lucke) (symposium on sports/antitrust)

The Misunderstood Alliance Between Sports Fans, Players, and the Antitrust Laws, 1997 Univ. of Illinois L. Rev. 601.

Lessons from the "True North Strong and Free", 65 Antitrust L.J. 467 (1997) (symposium on Canadian competition law)

Did the Canadian Parliament Really Permit Mergers that Exploit Canadian Consumers So the World Can be More Efficient?, 65 Antitrust L.J. 641 (1997) (symposium)

The Evolving Tort of Conspiracy to Restrain Trade Under Canadian Common Law, 75 Canadian Bar Rev. 193 (1996)

Reconsidering Flood v. Kuhn, 12 U. Miami J. Ent. & Sports Law 169 (1995)

The Limited Relevance of Plain Meaning, 73 Washington U. L. Q. 1057 (1995) (symposium)

Justice Breyer and the Fault Lines of Antitrust, 40 Antitrust Bulletin 169 (1995)

PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF ANTITRUST (Foundation Press 1993)

Where Have You Gone, Karl Llewellyn? Should Congress Turn its Lonely Eyes to You?, 45 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 561 (1992) (symposium on canons of statutory interpretation)

Comment on Spulber & Besanko's Delegation, Commitment and the Regulatory Mandate, 8 Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 155 (March 1992) (symposium)

Break Up the Sports League Monopolies, in The Business of Professional Sports (P. Staudohar & J. Mangan, eds.) (Univ. of Illinois Press 1991)

An Antitrust Analysis of Sports League Contracts with Cable Networks, 39 Emory L.J. 463 (1990)

Reaganist Realism Comes to Detroit, 1989 University of Illinois L. Rev. 399

Monopoly Sports Leagues, 73 Minnesota L. Rev. 643 (1989)

Legislative Enforcement of Equal Protection, 72 Minnesota L. Rev. 311 (1987)

 

Student Publications

Comment, Exclusionary Zoning in California: A Statutory Mechanism for Judicial Nondeference, 68 Calif. L. Rev. 1154 (1979) (with Edward G. Weil)

Note, Bordenkircher v. Hayes: Ignoring Prosecutorial Abuses in Plea Bargaining, 67 Calif.L.Rev. 675 (1978)

 

Other Publications

Verbot der zentralen Vermarktung bringt nur Vorteile (The Prohibition of Centralized Marketing Brings Advantages), Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 3, 1998

Losing the Football Game, Legal Times, July 29, 1996

Consumers lose in recent sports labor exemption cases, Antitrust magazine (summer 1995)

Rededication Panel Discussion on Gender Equity and Intercollegiate Athletics, 1995 University of Illinois L. Rev. 133

A Solution to return to the ballpark, Indianapolis Star, Aug. 28, 1994

After McNeil: How About Plan "F" (For Fans)?, For the Record (Marquette Univ. Nat'l Sports Law Inst.), Oct./Nov. 1992

Recent Sports Antitrust Developments: Another Perspective, The Sports Lawyer, Mar.-Apr. 1992

Notre Dame's maverick deal demands action, The National Sports Daily, Mar. 12, 1990

Court to Review Dealer Termination Agreements, Antitrust magazine, fall 1987

Standards for Judging Allegedly Anticompetitive Agreements Between Leagues and Players, Antitrust magazine, summer 1987

Power Play: The NFL Wins, Arizonans Lose in Antitrust Case Brought By USFL, Arizona Republic, August 10, 1986


This page last edited on Wednesday, May 24, 2000 08:28:57 AM
by the University of Illinois College of Law Webmaster
Copyright © 1999 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
All rights reserved