I. Introduction
Fidel Castro recently stepped down as president of Cuba. Castro's health, not the 46 year trade embargo, was the primary reason for Castro's statement that he "would not seek to retain his post." [1] Anyone seeking a radical change in the policies of Cuba may have to wait indefinitely, as Fidel Castro's younger brother Raul quickly supplanted him. In a ceremony, on February 24th, Fidel's younger brother was formally designated as Fidel's successor as the head of Cuba's Council of state. [2] Furthermore, Raul stressed that although Fidel will step down as president, Fidel will continue to be "consulted on important decisions, especially on those relating to defense, foreign policy and the economy." [3] However, American politicians and the public have yet another opportunity to consider the continuing effects of the trade embargo placed upon Cuba nearly 50 years ago. Clearly, Fidel was able to defy the wishes of the United States for several decades without giving in to pressure to relinquish Cuba's adherence to Communist ideology. Unfortunately, the embargo devastated Cuban citizens. In a country where the average wage per month is $20, more U.S. aid needs to be given. [4] Considering the current economy of Cuba, is the embargo still a "humane method of coercion" against Cuba, or is it detrimental to yet another generation of Cubans? [5] [More]