University of Illinois College of Law University of Illinois College of Law
prospective current faculty academics library alumni careers





Courtwatching: 2004-2005 Pilot Phase

Report on the 2004-2005 Pilot Phase of the Champaign County Courtwatching Project: A Collaboration of The League of Women Voters of Champaign County and The University of Illinois College of Law

There was a time in our country when "going courting" meant being at the courthouse to watch local courtroom drama unfold. Citizens kept track of the judges and lawyers, observed all the important civil and criminal trials and often were entertained by the persuasive advocacy presented in the local courtrooms.

Unfortunately, those are times gone by. It is now clear that unwatched courts can lead to poor advocacy, poor decisions and even at the worst, corruption. For many years the League of Women Voters of Champaign County (LWVCC) has organized a courtwatching program to assure the citizenry that its courts are functioning properly and with all necessary resources. For over 15 years, the LWVCC has partnered with the University of Illinois College of Law to provide a constant presence in the state and federal courts in Champaign County. Each of the students enrolled in the Trial Advocacy course at the College of Law (approximately 130 students in the Fall 2004 semester) is required to spend 12 hours courtwatching for educational purposes related to their enrollment in the course, with the League providing training for the law students.

This Report on the 2004-2005 Pilot Phase of the Champaign County Courtwatching Project summarizes the primary findings of the pilot phase of this initiative. We intend to continue this collaboration with the aim of collecting a larger sample of data and conducting a longitudinal study.

In summary, the primary findings from analysis of 1,657 hours (more than 69 days) of courtwatching are:

  1. In the sample size observed during the pilot project, the statistical analysis shows no evidence of bias in the selection of jurors from among those available in the jury pool.

 

  1. In the overwhelming majority of observations, our courtrooms were perceived as places where judges and other participants in proceedings observed decorum and treated one another with respect.

 

  1. There is a significant discrepancy between the demographics of Champaign County and the demographics of those citizens reporting for jury service.

For example, while census data indicate an 11% African-American population for Champaign County, and a 15% African-American population for the cities of Champaign and Urbana, the observed African-American representation in the jury pools at the Champaign County Courthouse is about 6%.

This means, for example, of 17 observed jury trials in the pilot observation period in which the defendants were African-American men, only 4 African-American men and 10 African-American women jurors (out of 252 jurors and alternates for each jury) were seated. Nine other African-American potential jurors were excused in the jury selection of those trials.

Observers reported instances of perceived unfairness in our courts on matters that some procedural adjustments could address and correct.

For example:

  • Many observers reported instances when it was questionable whether the defendants could hear, understand, and participate meaningfully in their proceedings via the video arraignment system currently in use in the Champaign County Courts. Observers noted circumstances in which defendants could not hear proceedings and did not understand remarks addressed to them. In addition, defendants sometimes had not met their attorneys before arraignment and did not appear to understand the proceedings or the ramifications of their participation.

 

  • Observers reported many instances when, after being asked "Do you understand?" by the judges, defendants would answer in the negative without any follow-up by the judges to ensure the defendants' understanding. In other words, proceedings continued under these circumstances on several occasions regardless of the defendants' responses.

 

  • Observers noted occasions when court proceedings were interrupted and continued to a later date to obtain the presence of an interpreter.

Courtwatching Data Analysis

Report Credits

Download the complete report

If you have any questions about the project, please contact either:

If you are interested in becoming a courtwatcher, please contact Ms. Miller.

 


Open Monday-Friday from 8:00 a.m.- 4:30 p.m.     Phone (217)333-6066     Fax (217)244-1478     llm@law.uiuc.edu